BJP ignoring injustice faced by gig workers, says Rahul Gandhi

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Item Detail
Statute Code on Social Security, 2020 — one of 4 Labour Codes (others: Industrial Relations Code, Occupational Safety Health & Working Conditions Code, Code on Wages) [S3]
Nodal Ministry Ministry of Labour and Employment
Definitions "Gig worker" — works outside traditional employer-employee relationship; "Platform worker" — accesses organisations/individuals via online platform to provide services [S1]
Funding mechanism Aggregators contribute 1–2% of annual turnover, capped at 5% of amount paid/payable to gig and platform workers, into a Social Security Fund [S1]
Registration portal e-Shram portal — issues Universal Account Number (UAN) to unorganised, gig, and platform workers on self-declaration basis [S1]
State-level laws Rajasthan (2023), Karnataka, Telangana (draft, 2025), Jharkhand — welfare/registration Acts for gig-platform workers [S10]
Political actors in news Rahul Gandhi (LoP, Lok Sabha); BJP (Centre + BJP-ruled States); Congress-ruled States (developing model framework) [Article]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Social - Gig work draws heavily from informal, migrant, Dalit and tribal labour pools, per Gandhi's claim, raising equity concerns around caste-based occupational segregation [Article]. - Women gig workers face compounded vulnerability — economic precarity plus safety/harassment risks [Article].

Economic - Gig/platform economy is a fast-growing employment segment absorbing surplus labour from agriculture/informal sectors but offers no fixed wage floor, PF, or gratuity by default. - Aggregator cess (1–2% of turnover) under the SS Code, 2020 is the principal funding innovation for portable social security [S1].

Legal/Constitutional - Labour falls under the Concurrent List (List III), enabling both Union Labour Codes and State-specific gig-worker Acts (e.g., Rajasthan, Telangana) — occasionally leading to overlapping or inconsistent frameworks [S10]. - Code on Social Security, 2020 has faced delayed notification — rules pending in many States, causing an implementation gap the Opposition is targeting.

Administrative/Governance - Effective delivery depends on Centre-State coordination: Central Code sets the framework; States must notify rules and operationalise Social Security Boards. - e-Shram UAN registration is self-declaration based — raising concerns of under-registration/exclusion errors.

Political - The statement reflects Opposition strategy of contrasting Congress-ruled State welfare initiatives with perceived Central inaction, ahead of political mobilisation among informal-sector voters.

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources