RAF diary entry shows Delhi Police authorised pellet gun use on July 20
1. At a Glance
- A General Diary (GD) entry at Parliament Street police station, registered at 1.24 a.m. on July 22, 2026, confirms the Rapid Action Force (RAF) fired an anti-riot gun (pellets) on July 20 during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) "Sansad Chalo" march to Parliament. [S1][S2]
- Significant because Delhi Police had earlier categorically denied any pellet gun use, despite at least four protesters reporting pellet injuries. [S1][S2]
- Marks the first recorded instance of pellet gun use against unarmed protesters in the national capital, reviving the post-2016 Kashmir pellet-gun policy debate in a new geography. [S3][S4]
- Tests UPSC candidates on crowd-control SOPs, use-of-force doctrine, RAF/CRPF institutional structure, and executive-magistrate/DCP powers under policing law. [S4]
2. Why in the News
- On July 20, 2026, RAF personnel fired munitions — including plastic pellets from an anti-riot gun — at CJP protesters near Parliament/Jantar Mantar/Connaught Place, Delhi. [S1][S2]
- Delhi Police initially denied pellet use; the GD entry accessed by The Hindu and corroborated by other outlets confirmed firing occurred "on the orders of Zone-1 DCP, Jantar Mantar." [S1][S2][S3]
- Following the incident, RAF withdrew shock batons, electric shields, pump-action guns, and anti-riot (pellet-firing) guns from personnel deployed at Jantar Mantar. [S1]
- A review by an RAF Inspector-General flagged "serious deficiencies" in RAF conduct, calling it a violation of the force's "sensitive policing" principle. [S1]
- A CRPF inquiry separately found an RAF jawan at Connaught Place fired at least seven pellet rounds, five of which hit peaceful protesters. [S3]
3. Background & Evolution
- RAF is a specialised wing of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), raised in 1992 for riot/communal-violence control, trained in "sensitive policing" (minimum force, non-partisan conduct). [S4]
- Pellet guns / anti-riot guns (ARGs) entered the Indian crowd-control arsenal prominently after the 2010 Kashmir unrest, formalised for use by 2016 during the post-Burhan Wani unrest in J&K, where pellet injuries (including blindings) caused major controversy. [S4]
- Following the 2016 backlash, the Union Government constituted an Expert Committee (July 26, 2016) to find alternatives to pellet guns (e.g., PAVA/chilli-based shells); recommendations were meant to inform operational guidelines. [S4]
- Until July 20, 2026, pellet guns had not been officially used against protesters in Delhi, making this the first such confirmed instance in the capital. [S1][S3]
4. Core Static Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Force involved | Rapid Action Force (RAF), a wing of CRPF |
| Ordering authority | Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Zone-1, Jantar Mantar |
| Date of incident | July 20, 2026 |
| GD entry registered | July 22, 2026, 1.24 a.m., Parliament Street PS |
| Protest group | Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) — "Sansad Chalo" march (reportedly linked to NEET paper-leak issue) |
| Munitions fired (per diary) | 55 rounds non-electrical shell, 15 rounds electrical shell, 5 tear-smoke shells, 2 pellet (ballistic cartridge) rounds |
| Separate CRPF inquiry finding | 7 pellet rounds fired at Connaught Place; 5 hit protesters |
| Post-incident action | Withdrawal of shock batons, electric shields, pump-action guns, anti-riot (pellet) guns from RAF at Jantar Mantar |
| Oversight review | RAF Inspector-General review — found "serious deficiencies" |
| Doctrine violated (alleged) | RAF's "sensitive policing" principle |
| Parent ministry | Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) — administrative control of CRPF/RAF |
[S1][S2][S3][S4]
5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis
Legal / Constitutional - Use of force by police/RAF for crowd control is governed by SOPs requiring weapons to be aimed below the waist; deployment authorised by an executive officer (DCP) under statutory/executive powers to manage public order. [S4] - Raises questions under Article 19(1)(b) (right to peaceful assembly) vs. reasonable restrictions under Article 19(3), and potential Article 21 concerns (right to life/dignity) if disproportionate force is used. - Denial of pellet use by Delhi Police, later contradicted by official records, raises accountability and truthfulness-in-governance concerns.
Administrative / Governance - Highlights command accountability — force was used "on orders of" a specific DCP, raising questions on delegation of use-of-force authority to a single officer. - Internal RAF Inspector-General review flagging "serious deficiencies" shows an internal oversight mechanism functioning, but post-facto rather than preventive. - Demonstrates coordination gaps between CRPF (RAF) and Delhi Police in joint law-and-order operations — RAF is a central force operating under local police direction.
Ethical / Human Rights - Pellet guns are a controversial "less-lethal" weapon — 2016 Kashmir experience showed risk of blinding and serious injury even when "non-lethal." - Case exemplifies tension between crowd control necessity and proportionality/human rights of protesters.
Historical - Draws a direct parallel to 2016 Kashmir pellet gun controversy, which led to the Expert Committee and calls for PAVA shells as alternatives — this incident reopens that unresolved policy question in a new context (Delhi, not J&K).
Social - Protesters at CJP march reportedly linked to NEET paper-leak issue, connecting this policing episode to the broader socio-political debate on examination integrity and student unrest.
6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)
- July 20, 2026: CJP "Sansad Chalo" march to Parliament; RAF fires anti-riot gun rounds, including pellets, at protesters near Jantar Mantar/Connaught Place. [S1][S2]
- Days after July 20: Delhi Police publicly denies pellet gun usage despite protester injury reports. [S1]
- July 22, 2026, 1.24 a.m.: General Diary entry registered at Parliament Street PS documenting the RAF firing, accessed later by The Hindu. [S1]
- Post-July 22: RAF withdraws pellet-firing anti-riot guns, pump-action guns, shock batons, electric shields from Jantar Mantar deployment. [S1]
- Ongoing: RAF Inspector-General review and separate CRPF inquiry both examine conduct; CRPF inquiry finds 7 pellet rounds fired, 5 hits on protesters at Connaught Place. [S1][S3]
- July 28–29, 2026: Media (The Hindu, Tribune, TheWire, ThePrint, TheFederal, Onmanorama) report on the leaked diary entry, forcing public acknowledgment of the earlier denial's inaccuracy. [S1][S2][S3][S5]
7. Prelims Hooks
- RAF (Rapid Action Force) is a specialised wing of the CRPF, raised for riot control, guided by the principle of "sensitive policing."
- The GD entry on pellet gun use was registered at Parliament Street police station, Delhi.
- GD entry timestamp: 1.24 a.m., July 22, 2026.
- Underlying incident date: July 20, 2026 — "Sansad Chalo" march by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP).
- Order for firing came from a Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Zone-1, Jantar Mantar.
- Diary entry records 55 rounds non-electrical shell, 15 electrical shell, 5 tear-smoke shells, 2 pellet rounds fired.
- A separate CRPF inquiry found 7 pellet rounds fired at Connaught Place, 5 hitting protesters.
- This was the first confirmed use of pellet guns against unarmed protesters in Delhi.
- Post-incident, RAF withdrew pump-action guns, anti-riot (pellet) guns, electric shields, and shock batons from Jantar Mantar deployment.
- An RAF Inspector-General review found "serious deficiencies" in RAF conduct during the march.
- CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) — a Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
- Pellet gun policy controversy originally rose to national prominence during the 2016 Kashmir unrest (post-Burhan Wani).
- The Union Government's Expert Committee on pellet-gun alternatives was set up on July 26, 2016.
- SOP for crowd-control firearm use requires aiming below the waist.
- Delhi Police had initially denied pellet gun use before the diary entry surfaced.
8. Mains Relevance
- GS-II: Governance, transparency and accountability of government; Role of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs); Centre-State coordination in policing (Delhi being under central MHA jurisdiction for police).
- GS-III: Internal security — Role of CAPFs in internal security and crowd management; use-of-force doctrine.
- GS-IV: Ethics in public administration — accountability, truthfulness, proportionality in the exercise of state power.
- Possible Mains question stems: 1. "Discuss the doctrine of 'minimum force' in crowd control and evaluate India's institutional mechanisms for oversight of Central Armed Police Forces in this regard." (GS-III) 2. "Examine the constitutional and ethical issues involved when law-enforcement agencies deny facts later contradicted by official records." (GS-II/GS-IV) 3. "Central Armed Police Forces operate under dual accountability — the Centre and local police administration. Discuss the challenges this poses for command responsibility, with reference to recent crowd-control incidents." (GS-II/III)
9. Related Topics to Study Next
- 2016 Kashmir pellet gun controversy & Expert Committee recommendations — direct historical precedent for this issue.
- Structure of Central Armed Police Forces (CRPF, RAF, BSF, CISF, ITBP, SSB) — institutional context for RAF.
- Delhi Police's unique administrative status (under MHA, not Delhi government) — relevant to accountability questions.
- Right to peaceful assembly (Article 19(1)(b)) and reasonable restrictions (Article 19(3)) — constitutional lens.
- Use-of-force continuum / non-lethal weapons policy in India (PAVA shells, tear gas, water cannons).
- NEET examination controversy/paper leaks — the substantive grievance behind the CJP protest.
- Police reforms in India — Model Police Act, Justice Verma Committee, judicial oversight of police powers.
10. Common Errors / Trap Areas
- Do not confuse RAF (Rapid Action Force) with the Indian Air Force or the UK's Royal Air Force — in Indian exam context RAF = CRPF's riot-control wing.
- Do not assume Delhi Police reports to the Delhi (state) government — Delhi Police falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India (relevant for accountability analysis).
- Do not conflate this incident with the 2016 Kashmir pellet gun episode — same weapon type but different geography, force (there, CRPF/J&K Police), and political context.
- Distinguish General Diary (GD) entry from an FIR — a GD/DD entry is a record of routine occurrences at a police station, not a criminal complaint.
- Avoid assuming pellet guns are official standard-issue for all police forces — their use is situational/authorised on order of specific executive officers (DCP-level), not automatic.
11. Sources
- [S1] RAF diary entry shows Delhi Police authorised pellet gun use on July 20 — The Hindu — https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/2026-07-29/th_chennai/articleGJRGAN34Q-15712788.ece — (tier: 4)
- [S2] RAF fired multiple munitions, including pellets during July 20 Cockroach Janta Party protests, reveals police diary — Onmanorama — https://www.onmanorama.com/news/india/2026/07/28/raf-fired-multiple-munitions-including-pellets-during-july-20-cockroach-janta-party-protests-reveals-police-diary.html — (tier: 4)
- [S3] RAF Fired Seven Pellet Gun Rounds on July 20, Five Hit Protesters, CRPF Report Finds — The Wire — https://m.thewire.in/article/rights/raf-personnel-fired-seven-pellet-gun-rounds-on-july-20-five-hit-protesters-crpf-report-finds/amp — (tier: 4)
- [S4] Delhi pellet gun allegations revive debate over controversial crowd-control weapon — The News Minute — https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/delhi-pellet-gun-allegations-revive-debate-over-controversial-crowd-control-weapon — (tier: 4)
- [S5] 1 RAF personnel fired 2 shots of anti-riot gun on protestors on Delhi DCP's order, police DD entry shows — ThePrint — https://theprint.in/india/1-raf-personnel-fired-2-shots-of-anti-riot-gun-on-protestors-on-delhi-dcps-order-police-dd-entry-shows/2998576/ — (tier: 4)