PMFBY Provides Comprehensive Crop Insurance; States Allowed Add-On Cover for Wild Animal Damage

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Shifts fiscal burden of wild-animal cover to States, preserving Centre's actuarial subsidy frame [S1]. - Protects smallholder incomes in HWC hotspots where elephant/wild-boar/nilgai damage can wipe out single plots.

Environmental / Ecological - Indirect tool for human-wildlife conflict mitigation; reduces retaliatory killing incentive by compensating losses [S2]. - Complements Project Elephant, Project Tiger corridor management.

Administrative / Federal - States must notify animals and vulnerable units — operationalises cooperative federalism; loss assessment is individual (not area-based like main PMFBY) [S1][S2]. - Add-on premium wholly state-funded, so uptake will depend on State fiscal will.

Legal / Governance - Operationalised via PMFBY Operational Guidelines (executive, not statutory) [S1]. - Sits alongside Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 ex-gratia regimes administered by MoEFCC.

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

Plausible stems: 1. "Discuss how PMFBY's add-on cover for wild-animal damage addresses both agrarian distress and human-wildlife conflict. Examine implementation challenges." 2. "Critically evaluate the design of PMFBY in addressing non-preventable agricultural risks. (250 words)" 3. "Cooperative federalism is visible in the customisation of central schemes by States. Illustrate with PMFBY add-on covers."

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources