CASTE BASED CENSUS

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Social - Provides empirical basis for revisiting the 50% reservation ceiling (Indra Sawhney, 1992) and sub-classification of SCs (Davinder Singh, 2024) [S2]. - Enables identification of dominant vs. marginalised OBC sub-groups; supports Rohini Commission (constituted 2017) on OBC sub-categorisation.

Legal / Constitutional - Reinforces Article 340 (Commission for backward classes) and Article 342A (Centre-State list of SEBCs, 102nd CAA 2018, restored by 105th CAA 2021). - Subject competency: Census is Union; but states (Bihar 2023, Karnataka, Telangana) had conducted parallel surveys, raising federal-comity questions.

Administrative - Integrating caste into the main Census (vs. separate SECC model) avoids the classification failure of SECC 2011 where ~46 lakh caste names were reported [S3]. - Digital enumeration shortens processing time but raises data-security concerns under DPDP Act, 2023.

Ethical / Governance - Tension between evidence-based welfare and risk of caste consolidation/political mobilisation. - Transparency demand: release of raw caste tables vs. aggregated data.

Economic - Inputs into targeted welfare (PM-KISAN, PMAY, scholarships) and labour-market diagnostics. - Likely budgetary expansion of OBC-linked schemes post data release.

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources