Sale of Banned Medicines

I have sufficient grounded facts. Writing the note now.

Sale of Banned Medicines — UPSC Study Note

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional - Centre's power under Section 26A has repeatedly been challenged in High Courts; petitioners secured interim protection for stock already in distribution channels, diluting enforcement [S1]. - Supreme Court's 2017 directive forced expert re-examination, embedding judicial oversight over executive drug bans [S2].

Administrative - Dual federal structure: Centre bans and licenses new drugs (CDSCO); States license manufacturers and inspect retail (State Drug Controllers) — creates enforcement gaps for banned stock at pharmacy level [S2]. - DTAB review is the procedural anchor before Section 26A notifications [S2].

Scientific / Public Health - FDC bans target combinations lacking therapeutic justification and posing risk (e.g., irrational antibiotic + analgesic mixes feeding antimicrobial resistance) [S2]. - Animal-use drug bans (36 in 2025) reflect One-Health concerns over zoonotic transmission and residue in food chain [S1].

Economic - India is the "pharmacy of the world" — bans hit a multi-thousand-crore FDC segment; industry litigation reflects revenue stakes [S2].

Ethical / Governance - Tension between pharma industry interests, public health precaution, and judicial caution on livelihoods/stock-in-trade.

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources