PROVISIONS UNDER THE AMASR ACT

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional - Section 20A–E inserted by 2010 Amendment statutorily fixed earlier executive notifications [S2][S3]. - Article 49 (DPSP) and Article 51A(f) (FD) underpin the framework [S3]. - Central Government may, on NMA's recommendation, extend the prohibited area beyond 100 m via Gazette notification [S2].

Administrative - NMA grades monuments and vets construction applications in regulated areas; ASI executes conservation [S1][S2]. - Heritage Bye-laws (Sec 20E) allow site-specific calibration — addressing the rigidity criticism of uniform 100/200 m [S1].

Socio-Economic - Uniform buffer affects livelihoods of residents and public infrastructure projects (roads, metro, bridges) — driver of the proposed 2017 amendment [S1][S2]. - PIB framing (2026) explicitly cites balance with "development needs and livelihoods of nearby residents" [S1].

Ethical / Governance - Tension between heritage protection vs. inclusive development; concerns that diluting Section 20A would weaken conservation regime [S2].

6. Recent Developments

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources