PARLIAMENT QUESTION: LATERAL ENTRY

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Administrative - Imports domain specialists into a generalist IAS-dominated secretariat; targets sectors like Finance, Commerce, Civil Aviation, Renewable Energy. [S2] - Reduces vacancy at JS-level where IAS shortage is acute (DoPT data shows persistent JS-grade deficit). [S2]

Legal / Constitutional - Permitted under Art. 309 (Parliament's power to regulate recruitment) and Recruitment Rules of respective cadres. [S2] - Reservation question hinges on single-post v. cadre-strength; Govt invokes PGIMER ruling to justify absence of SC/ST/OBC quota. [S1]

Ethical / Governance - Pros: Merit-based, breaks cadre monopoly, brings private-sector efficiency. - Cons: Conflict of interest (private sector lobbying), bypasses reservation, opaque selection of "single-post cadre".

Social - Critics argue circumvention of Articles 16(4), 335 (reservation for SC/ST/OBC); 2024 withdrawal acknowledged this concern. [S2]

Historical / Comparative - Precedents: Manmohan Singh, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Bimal Jalan, Raghuram Rajan, Nandan Nilekani — earlier ad-hoc lateral inductions. [S2]

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources