Steps taken against Adulteration

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional - Falls under Concurrent List (food adulteration — Entry 18, List III) — explains Centre-State shared enforcement [S1]. - FSS Act, 2006 provides for civil penalties (Adjudicating Officer) and criminal prosecution (Special Courts) for misbranded/substandard/unsafe food [S3].

Administrative - Two-tier model: FSSAI (standard-setting, coordination, regional offices) + State Food Safety Commissioners (licensing, inspection, sampling, prosecution) [S1]. - Risk-Based Inspection System (RBIS): inspection frequency calibrated to risk level of food product [S1]. - National Annual Surveillance Plan (NASP): pan-India sampling strategy by FSSAI [S1].

Social / Health - Adulteration in milk, edible oils, spices disproportionately hits low-income consumers; directly impacts Right to Health (Art. 21 jurisprudence). - Consumer-facing tools: complaint redressal channels recorded 7,700+ complaints in FY 2024-25 [S1].

Scientific / Technological - FSSAI deploys science-based standards, accredited NABL labs, rapid testing kits for milk/spices; surveys for contaminants pan-India [S2].

Governance / Federalism - Enforcement gap stems from State-level capacity: shortage of FSOs, labs, designated officers — recurrent CAG/Standing Committee critique.

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources