CONSERVATION OF MONUMENTS BY PRIVATE SECTOR - ADOPT A HERITAGE (AAH) 2.0

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Channelises private CSR funds to public heritage, reducing fiscal pressure on ASI [S2]. - Expected multiplier via heritage tourism — amenity upgrades increase footfall and ancillary local employment [S3].

Administrative / Governance - Limits PPP to non-conservational amenities, ring-fencing archaeological integrity within ASI [S1]. - Selection done in consultation with ASI; transparency through online portal addresses 1.0-era criticisms [S2].

Legal / Constitutional - Operates within AMASR Act, 1958; complements Article 49 (DPSP — State obligation to protect monuments of national importance) and Article 51A(f) (Fundamental Duty to value composite culture). - Companies Act 2013 Schedule VII (clause v) explicitly permits CSR spend on protection of national heritage, art and culture.

Ethical - Concerns over commodification of heritage and branding by corporates — mitigated by AAH 2.0's explicit non-conservational ring-fence [S1].

Social - Differently-abled, women and child-friendly facilities (ramps, child-care rooms) prioritised under amenity list [S1].

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

Plausible question stems: 1. "Critically examine whether the 'Adopt a Heritage 2.0' programme adequately balances private participation with the imperative of safeguarding archaeological integrity." (GS-I/II) 2. "Discuss the role of CSR in conservation of national heritage with reference to AAH 2.0 and the AMASR Act, 1958." (GS-II) 3. "PPP in heritage management has shifted from 'adoption' to 'amenity provision'. Analyse the rationale and implications." (GS-II)

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources