IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMILE SCHEME

I have enough facts. Writing the note.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMILE SCHEME — UPSC Study Note

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Social - Targets two of the most stigmatised groups — transgender persons and beggars — bringing them within the formal welfare grid [S2]. - Rights-based shift: from criminalisation (legacy of Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959) to rehabilitation [S1][S4].

Legal / Constitutional - Anchored in Articles 14, 21, 23, 38, 41 & 46; complements Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 [S2]. - Several High Courts (e.g., J&K HC, 2019) and SC have struck down anti-begging provisions as violating Art. 14 & 21 — SMILE provides the welfare alternative [S4].

Administrative - Multi-stakeholder model: MoSJE + State Governments + ULBs + NGOs + Municipal Corporations [S4]. - Bottlenecks visible — only ~32% rehabilitation rate (9,855 of 31,055) prompted SFC memorandum revision based on NIRDPR findings [S1].

Economic - Modest fiscal footprint (₹365 cr/5 yrs) relative to ambition; emphasis on livelihood creation via SHGs and PM-DAKSH rather than cash transfers [S2].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources