Press Release on 164th Report of the Committee on Petitions, Rajya Sabha on the Petition praying to evolve an efficient mechanism to check the exorbitant prices of cardiac stents and other medical devices

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Stent capping yielded patient savings; broader medicines price-fixation projected savings of ₹12,447 crore to patients [S7]. - Trade margin in stents (pre-2017) was up to ~380%, indicating market failure justifying price control [S4].

Social / Right to Health - Cardiovascular disease is India's largest mortality cause; out-of-pocket expenditure forces catastrophic health spending — petition framed as right-to-affordable-healthcare issue [S1].

Legal / Constitutional - Petition mechanism operationalises Article 350 (representation to authorities) via parliamentary forum; price control derives from Article 39(b) (DPSP — material resources of community). - DPCO uses delegated legislation under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [S5].

Administrative / Governance - Bi-nodal: NPPA (pricing) + CDSCO (quality/licensing); coordination gaps flagged historically. - Trade Margin Rationalisation (TMR) approach extended to 42 anti-cancer drugs and select devices as alternative to ceiling pricing.

Ethical - Tension between patent/innovation incentives (imported DES) vs. affordability; multinational manufacturers had sought "withdrawal" of high-end stents post-cap — NPPA disallowed [S4].

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources