Model Guidelines on Care, Rehabilitation and Management of Beggars’/Shelter Homes Unveiled at Chintan Shivir

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Social / Equity - Targets one of the most invisibilised groups; integrates child and gender sensitivity as a stand-alone pillar — recognising women and minors in begging streams [S1]. - Replaces a penal-custodial legacy (1959 Act) with a rights-based rehabilitative framework.

Legal / Constitutional - Aligns with Article 21 (right to life with dignity) and Article 41 (DPSP — right to public assistance in cases of want) — informs the Harsh Mander (2018) jurisprudence decriminalising begging in Delhi. - Begging remains under State List; Model Guidelines work via advisory/cooperative federalism rather than statutory mandate [S1].

Administrative / Governance - Standardisation tackles inter-State variance in shelter-home quality; Accountability & Oversight pillar institutionalises monitoring [S1]. - Convergence with PMAY, Ayushman Bharat, Skill India, PDS, ICDS implicit in convergence emphasis [S1].

Economic - Vocational Training & Rehabilitation pillar aims to translate rescue into livelihoods; SMILE outlay ₹365 cr (5 years) is modest, signalling reliance on convergence rather than fresh outlay [S3].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

Possible question stems: 1. "Decriminalising begging without rehabilitative infrastructure is half a reform." Examine in light of the 2026 Model Guidelines on Beggars'/Shelter Homes. (GS-II, 15M) 2. Discuss the role of convergence-based frameworks like the SMILE scheme in addressing urban destitution. (GS-II, 10M) 3. Evaluate the shift from penal to rehabilitative approaches in India's policy on begging, with reference to constitutional provisions and recent judicial pronouncements. (GS-II)

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources