Supreme Court Gets Five New Judges as President Approves Appointments

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional - Appointment power under Art. 124(2) is formal; substantive decision lies with the Collegium, per Second Judges Case (1993) [S4]. - Notifications cite clause (2) of Art. 124 as enabling provision [S1]. - Reinforces basic structure doctrine — judicial independence held inviolable in NJAC verdict (2015) [S4].

Administrative / Governance - Tackles case pendency: SC arrears > 80,000; expanded strength aimed at faster disposal [S3]. - Four of five appointees are sitting HC Chief Justices; one direct elevation from Bar (Senior Advocate Mohana) — preserves the convention of bar-bench mix [S2].

Social / Representation - V. S. Mohana = direct elevation from Bar; significant for gender representation in higher judiciary [S2]. - Constitution does not provide caste/class reservation in higher judiciary appointments [S4].

Federal - Five appointees drawn from HCs across Punjab & Haryana, Bombay, MP, J&K-Ladakh — broad regional spread [S1].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources